Legal Opinion

United States v. Oregon-Cortez

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided February 12, 2003No. 1:02-cr-00113PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DANIEL, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the January 13, 2003, hearing on the Government’s Motion to Limit the Scope of Both the Defendants’ Written Motions to Suppress the Wiretaps and the Evidentiary Hearing on the Motions to Suppress the Wiretaps filed December 2, 2002. Through this motion, the Government seeks a definitive ruling as to the circumstances under which an evidentiary hearing on “necessity” issues is required. My ruling will govern the hearings set for February 18,19, 20 and 21, 2003.

I. BackgrouND

In my April 4, 2002, Order, I directed the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Nelson-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. John P. McGuire United States of America v. Cherlyn PetersenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Oscar Armendariz, United States of America v. Gabriel AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MertonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2003
  2. United States v. RoybalDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  3. United States v. MacKDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2003
  4. United States v. GarrisonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API