Legal Opinion

United States v. MacK

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided July 14, 2003No. 1:01-cr-00321PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SPARR, Senior District Judge.

This matter came on for hearing on Defendant Mack’s Motion to Suppress Wiretap Evidence, filed June 18, 2003. On May 28, 2003, the Court granted the Government’s Motion to allow it to withdraw its commitment to try Defendant Mack without wiretap evidence. At that time, the Court set a deadline for Defendant to file any motions challenging the wiretap on statutory grounds. The Court confirmed at that time that Defendant was specifically being given leave to file a motion attacking the wiretap based on the law as set forth in Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Douglas William BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Castillo-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Leon Delmar Milton, Etc., Lydia Gajewski, Etc., Jeffrey Sean Mitchell, Etc., and Ernest Thornton, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MoranDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API