Legal Opinion

United States v. Merton

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided July 31, 2003No. 1:01-cr-00317PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DANIEL, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ motions to suppress evidence obtained through twelve separate wiretaps and extensions thereto authorized by Senior United States District Judges Zita L. Weinshienk and John L. Kane, Jr. The Court held evidentiary hearings on these motions on April 80, May 1, 29 and 30, 2002. Having now carefully considered and evaluated the wiretap pleadings (Applications, Affidavits and Orders), Defendants’ motions, the Government’s responses, the testimony and evidence adduced, oral arguments, and the applicable law, it is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Rogelio QuintanaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HallDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
  2. United States v. GarrisonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API