Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Catalini
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BOWES, J.:
In this declaratory judgment action, Robert Catalini and Kathleen Catalini, h/w and Rose Catalini (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Appellants”) appeal from the judgment entered on the verdict in favor of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) following a bench trial on stipulated facts. We affirm.
The trial court succinctly summarized the relevant facts as follows:
From January of 2002 to November of 2004, Robert Catalini held an insurance policy with Nationwide wherein he was insured for three vehicles with BI [bodily injury] liability limits of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. LarrimoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Harvey v. Rouse Chamberlin, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Missett v. Hub International Pennsylvania, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Smith v. Hartford Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Supp v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Weilacher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Beach, K. & T. v. The Navigators Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Smith, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Davis v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- ECKMAN v. ENCOMPASS HOME AND AUTO INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.