Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Catalini

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 2011No. 923 EDA 2010PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

In this declaratory judgment action, Robert Catalini and Kathleen Catalini, h/w and Rose Catalini (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Appellants”) appeal from the judgment entered on the verdict in favor of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) following a bench trial on stipulated facts. We affirm.

The trial court succinctly summarized the relevant facts as follows:

From January of 2002 to November of 2004, Robert Catalini held an insurance policy with Nationwide wherein he was insured for three vehicles with BI [bodily injury] liability limits of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Insurance Exchange v. LarrimoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Harvey v. Rouse Chamberlin, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Missett v. Hub International Pennsylvania, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Smith v. Hartford Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Supp v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weilacher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Beach, K. & T. v. The Navigators Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. Smith, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Davis v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. ECKMAN v. ENCOMPASS HOME AND AUTO INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API