Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Rouse Chamberlin, Ltd.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 2, 2006PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY: PANELLA, J.:
¶ 1 Appellants, Nancy and Jim Harvey, appeal from the judgment entered on September 12, 2005,1 in favor of Appel-*525lees, Rouse Chamberlin, Ltd. (“Rouse Chamberlin”) and J.L. Watts Excavating (“Watts”), in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County. This is a slip and fall case. At the close of Appellants’ case-in-chief, Appellees moved for nonsuit arguing that the “hills and ridges” doctrine precluded a finding of liability. The trial court agreed and granted the nonsuit. After careful review, we reverse.
¶ 2 Appellants live in the Windtree Development in Plumsteadville…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Brinich v. JenckaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Mount Olivet Tabernacle Church v. Edwin L. Wiegand DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Morin v. Traveler's Rest Motel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Bacsick v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Collins, D. v. Philadelphia Suburban DevelopmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Growall v. MaiettaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Gillard v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CataliniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Beck v. HOLLY TREE HOMEOWNERS ASS'NDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.