State v. Ward
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
With the common law of England, to which the inhabitants of Maryland are constitutionally entitled, Md. Const., Dec. of Rights, Art. 5, came the doctrine of accessoryship applicable to felonies. Although the common law may be changed by legislative act 1 or judicial decision, 2 the doctrine has not been altered in this jurisdiction. Maryland is one of the few, if not the only state, which has retained this doctrine in virtually the same form as it existed at the time of William Blackstone in the 18th century, and it represents the law of Maryland at the present time. 3 State v. Williamson,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Dykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- State v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.