Legal Opinion

MacHinery Sales Co. v. Diamondcut Forestry Products, LLC

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 18, 2002PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

This is an action for rescission of a contract to purchase a chip mill. Purchaser sued seller and seller’s alleged agent for rescission, based upon theory of fraudulent misrepresentation. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

This action for rescission arises from a contract to purchase a chip mill. 1 Dennis Cameron (“Cameron”), owner of Defendant Diamondcut Forestry Products, LLC (“Diamondcut”), allegedly approached Richard Meadows (“Meadows”) of plaintiff Machinery Sales Co., Inc. 2 (“Machinery Sales”),…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of Walton v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. McCaleb v. Saturn Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hiller v. HaileyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. Employers Casualty Co. v. Dyess, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  5. Freeman v. Citizens' Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Manning v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  2. ANDREW ROGERS v. VICTORIA COXCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2025
  3. Alexander A. Stratienko v. Oscar H. BrockCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
  4. Bernie Cheatham d/b/a Universal Builders v. The Federal Materials Company, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  5. Brian & Candy Chadwick v. Chad SpenceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API