Employers Casualty Co. v. Dyess
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, Chief Justice.
In this case, we are asked to address the subrogation rights of a workers’ compensation carrier as they might apply to the employer’s uninsured motorist- coverage. Appellant, Employers Casualty Co. (Employers), challenges the granting of summary judgment in favor of appellees Carl L. Dyess, Jr. (Dyess), Northbrook Property and Casualty Co., Northbrook Indemnity Co. (collectively referred to as Northbrook), and Felipe Mendoza (Mendoza) denying Employers’ subrogation claims. For reasons we later discuss, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
A proper discussion of the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- City of the Colony v. North Texas Municipal Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Texas Ass'n of School Boards, Inc. v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- Nathan A. Watson Co. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- MacHinery Sales Co. v. Diamondcut Forestry Products, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Erivas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.