Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Citizens' Nat. Bank
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1934PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green
The above styled proceeding is in reality a consolidation of three suits, heard together by agreement and approval of the chancellor. The suits are by the holders of certain notes against the makers and a guarantor of those instruments and against the bank which transferred the instruments by delivery to the present holders. The chancellor rendered a decree against the makers and the guarantor, but dismissed the suits as to the bank, and the holders have appealed. The cases were tried upon a stipulation of facts.
The Citizens’ Bank (hereafter called the bank) was a state institution conducting…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Elgin City Banking Co. v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. Mercantile BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Robertson v. Bank of BristolTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- Woodard v. BirdTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Crescent Cotton Oil Co. v. Union Gin & Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- MacHinery Sales Co. v. Diamondcut Forestry Products, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Bevins v. LivesayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
- Hamilton Nat. Bank v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Palmer W. Collins and H. L. Clark, Iii, and William M. Ables, Jr. v. Pioneer Title Insurance Co., Palmer W. Collins and H. L. Clark, III v. Pioneer National Title Insurance Co., and William M. Ables, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Maddux v. Cargill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.