Legal Opinion

Lincoln v. Waterbury Button Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 3, 1923No. 1644PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

Four motions are here for consideration. The plaintiffs ask for a temporary injunction against both the defendant and the intervener; they also move to strike out the counterclaim filed by the intervener on the ground that the intervener cannot inject in this suit an issue for equitable relief, which could not have been presented by the defendant, the button company, and because the counterclaim is not germane to the issue raised by the bill and answer.

The intervener moves (1) to dismiss the bill on the ground that the bill, answer, counterclaim, affidavits, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Railroad Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Barry v. Harpoon Castor Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. Mattatuck Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. Lincoln v. Mattatuck Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API