Lincoln v. Waterbury Button Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
Four motions are here for consideration. The plaintiffs ask for a temporary injunction against both the defendant and the intervener; they also move to strike out the counterclaim filed by the intervener on the ground that the intervener cannot inject in this suit an issue for equitable relief, which could not have been presented by the defendant, the button company, and because the counterclaim is not germane to the issue raised by the bill and answer.
The intervener moves (1) to dismiss the bill on the ground that the bill, answer, counterclaim, affidavits, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Railroad Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Barry v. Harpoon Castor Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lincoln v. Mattatuck Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Lincoln v. Mattatuck Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1926