Legal Opinion

Barry v. Harpoon Castor Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 11, 1913No. 55PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for- the Southern District of New York. Suit in equity by Charles D. Barry, Frederick W. Lincoln, and John R. Bradlee; copartners trading under the name of Henry W. Peabody & Co., against the Harpoon Castor Manufacturing Company. Decree for defendant, and complainants appeal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for- the Southern District of New York. Suit in equity by Charles D. Barry, Frederick W. Lincoln, and John R. Bradlee; copartners trading under the name of Henry W. Peabody & Co., against the Harpoon Castor Manufacturing Company. Decree for defendant, and complainants appeal. On appeal from a decree of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, holding, invalid letters patent No. 995,758 granted June 20, 1911, to Henry M. Alleyn for an “anti-friction tip for furniture," and assigned to the complainants. The bill…

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, Circuit Judge.

The patent in controversy is for an exceedingly simple anti-friction device designed to take the place 'of castors previously used on the legs of tables, chairs and other similar pieces of furniture.

The object of the inventor was to provide a cheap anti-friction bearing device which can be readily and securely attached to any piece of *208furniture and permits it to slide easily over the surface of a rug, carpet or floor. The tip consists of a drawn sheet metal disk having a smooth, polished, convex surface and an upturned strengthening rim provided with a plurality of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Western Electric Co. v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Krementz v. S. Cottle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Consolidated Fastener Co. v. LittauerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. H. D. Smith & Co. v. PeckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  4. A. Kimball Co. v. Noesting Pin Ticket Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  5. Gross v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API