Hanson v. Lindstrom
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Ransom county; Allen, J. Action by Ole Hanson and others against Louis Lindstrom. Judgment in favor of plaintiffs. From an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. The office of a bill of particulars is to amplify a pleading and more particularly specify the claim or defense set up. Landon v. Sage, 11 Conn. 302; Blount v. Rick, 107 Ind. 238; Davis v. Freeman, 10 Mich. 188; Carter v. Tuck, 3 Gill (Md.) 248; Mathews y.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Ransom county; Allen, J. Action by Ole Hanson and others against Louis Lindstrom. Judgment in favor of plaintiffs. From an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. The office of a bill of particulars is to amplify a pleading and more particularly specify the claim or defense set up. Landon v. Sage, 11 Conn. 302; Blount v. Rick, 107 Ind. 238; Davis v. Freeman, 10 Mich. 188; Carter v. Tuck, 3 Gill (Md.) 248; Mathews y. Hubbard, 47 N. Y. 28; Garfield v. Parris, 96 U. S. 557, 24 L. Ed. '821; U. S. Land Investment Co. v. Mercantile Trust Co. 54 Hun. (N. Y.) 417. To…
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.
This is an action to recover a balance due on the purchase price of a threshing machine outfit. The contract is embodied in a written order for the threshing machine and attachments, upon the Advance Thresher Company, of Minneapolis, a foreign corporation. The machinery was delivered pursuant to the order and accepted by the defendant. In the order it was agreed by the defendant that he would make and deliver his promissory notes for the purchase price and secure the same by a mortgage on the machinery. The notes and mortgage were never delivered. After a trial before a jury, the trial court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kinney v. Brotherhood of American YeomenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. BarryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- State ex rel. Hart-Parr Co. v. Robb-Lawrence Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Johnson v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Cumming v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Westerso v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Burdick v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Friedenwald Co. v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- McIntosh Livestock Co. v. BuffingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Cumming v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.