People v. Noriega
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
Does Penal Code1 section 290’s sex offender registration requirement constitute cruel and unusual punishment when applied to a conviction for misdemeanor indecent exposure? (§ 314, subd. 1.) The California Supreme Court recently addressed this issue with regard to a similar misdemeanor provision, possession of child pornography, pursuant to section 311.11. (In re Alva (2004) 33 Cal.4th 254 [14 Cal.Rptr.3d 811, 92 P.3d 311] (Alva).) In Alva, the court concluded, “[Mandatory sex offender registration, as provided by section 290, is not ‘punishment’ for purposes of either the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.