Legal Opinion

Miller v. Vance Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1932No. 23486. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiffs, Miller and wife, commenced this action in the superior court for King county seeking recovery for personal injuries suffered by Mrs. Miller, claimed as the result of the negligence of the defendant lumber company in its failure to make safe the plaster of the ceiling of the bathroom of the apartment occupied by them as tenants of the lumber company in its apartment house. A trial upon the merits in that court, sitting with a jury, resulted in verdict and judgment awarding to Miller and wife recovery against the lumber company in the sum of $750, from which it has appealed to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Edwards v. . N.Y. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Cowen v. SunderlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Mesher v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Coke v. GutkeseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  5. Howard v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hogsett v. HannaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Roberts v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Price v. MacThwaite Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Pena v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Conradi v. ArnoldWashington Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API