Parker v. Swett
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Napa County. Henry C. Gesford, Judge. Judgment in S. F. No. 9559 affirmed; judgment in S. F. No. 9748 vacated, with direction for entry of judgment in accordance with opinion of Supreme Court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The above-entitled cases were tried separately and at different times. Separate judgments were given and separate appeals were taken. They both concern the same property and rights, and the points involved are so closely connected that it will simplify matters to decide them in one opinion. We will treat each case separately in the order of their respective numbers.
Case S. F. No. 9559.
This is an action to quiet the alleged title of the plaintiff to certain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Copeland v. Fairview Land & Water Co. & Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Smith v. WornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Wood v. BoydMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Currier v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Waters of Long Valley Creek Stream SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- Quinn v. StoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Silkey v. TiegsIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.