Legal Opinion

Silkey v. Tiegs

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1931No. 5651PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.

—This case involves the right to the use of artesian hot water developed from wells upon the lands owned by the parties situate in Sections 28 and 29, Twp. 4 N., R. 2 E. B. M., in Ada county, lying on high ground north of the Soldiers’ Home near Boise. The location and soil render them chiefly valuable for truck gardening purposes although hay and other crops are also grown thereon. The hot water from the wells is utilized to heat their homes and hotbeds as well as for irrigating crops. Appellant Tiegs’ well is about 155 feet east of respondent’s smaller well, which is 16 feet east of her…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nielson v. ParkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Morris v. BeanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1906
  3. Le Quime v. ChambersIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Salt Lake City v. Salt Lake City Water & Electrical Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Bower v. MoormanIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Baker v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re Srba Case No. 39576Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Sagewillow, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. County of Bonner v. DyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API