Coburn v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KIMBALL, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Defendant’s Request to Take Judicial Notice, and Plaintiffs’ oral motion to disallow the deposition of Dr. Healy. A hearing on these motions was held on October 31, 2001. At the hearing, Plaintiffs Judith Coburn et al. (“Plaintiffs”) were represented by Andy Vickery, and Defendant SmithKline Beecham, dba GlaxoS-mithKline (“GSK”), was represented by John A. Anderson. Before the hearing, the court considered carefully the memo-randa and other materials submitted by the parties. Since…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dodge v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Grundberg v. Upjohn Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- House v. Armour of America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Kramer v. Showa Denko K.K.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Comes v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Vanderwerf Ex Rel. Vanderwerf v. SmithKlineBeecham Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Joe Comes And Riley Paint, Inc., An Iowa Corporation, Vs. Microsoft Corporation, A Washington CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Siddoway v. GSK (In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017