Hill v. Hesse
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.
At the request of defendant Hesse, as contractor, the plaintiff furnished certain building materials for use upon and actually used in the construction of a building upon a lot of land owned by the defendant Mitchel. Defendant Mitchel had no contractual relation with plaintiff. Said materials so furnished by plaintiff not being paid for, the plaintiff, under date of February 21, 1929, which was within ninety days after actual completion of the building, filed a notice of mechanic’s lien against defendant Mitchel’s property for the sum of $429.75. Within ninety days thereafter, to wit, on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hughes Brothers v. HooverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Mox, Inc. v. LeventhalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- S. L. Jones & Co. v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richards v. Hillside Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- J. A. Campbell Co. v. Holsum Baking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re Paul Potts Builders, Inc., Bankrupt. William B. Grover, Trustee v. The County of MarinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Robinson v. S & S DevelopmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Dorer v. McKinzeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961