Motes/Henes Trust v. Motes
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Steele Hays, Justice.
The single issue presented by this appeal is whether a reference in the testator’s will to a power of appointment was sufficient to exercise a power of appointment in a trust instrument.
Helen Fay Henes, deceased, executed a will in 1979 containing the following residuary clause:
I give, devise and bequeath all of the remainder and residue of my estate together with property to which I may have a power of appointment at the time of my death, to the trustee hereinafter named, to be held in trust for the uses. . . . [Emphasis added.]
In 1982, the Motes/Henes trust was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McKelvy v. TerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Cross v. CrossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Cross v. ManningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- First Union National Bank v. MossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Roberts v. Northern Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Darr v. BankstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- In Re Estate of ConoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Matter of Estate of BurgessCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Clark v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Motes v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.