Legal Opinion

Motes/Henes Trust v. Motes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1988No. 88-186PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

The single issue presented by this appeal is whether a reference in the testator’s will to a power of appointment was sufficient to exercise a power of appointment in a trust instrument.

Helen Fay Henes, deceased, executed a will in 1979 containing the following residuary clause:

I give, devise and bequeath all of the remainder and residue of my estate together with property to which I may have a power of appointment at the time of my death, to the trustee hereinafter named, to be held in trust for the uses. . . . [Emphasis added.]

In 1982, the Motes/Henes trust was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McKelvy v. TerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Cross v. CrossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Cross v. ManningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. First Union National Bank v. MossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Roberts v. Northern Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Darr v. BankstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. In Re Estate of ConoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Matter of Estate of BurgessCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. Clark v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Motes v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API