Legal Opinion

Cross v. Cross

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1977No. KCD 27793 and KCD 27802PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

The protagonists in this appeal are family members disputing the interpretation to be afforded a will. The action was brought by plaintiffs-trustees for the construction of the will of Matthew Forbes Cross and of the testamentary trust of Mary Forbes Cross. Robert Roy Cross is a son of Matthew. The defendants are Walter M. Cross, III, a son of Matthew, and Kent Forbes Cross Rigsby, a paternal grandson, whose father predeceased Matthew, after which Kent was adopted by his stepfather.

The trial court, upon findings of fact and conclusions of law, entered a judgment in favor of the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Housman v. LewellenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Holzbach v. United Virginia BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  4. Schede EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Brown v. BibbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wetherill v. BashamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Matter of StrobelArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. First National Bank of McMinn County v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Matter of Estate of SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Meyer v. BradleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API