Legal Opinion

Steckel v. Vancil

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1914No. 18,882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Barton district court; Daniel A. Banta, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Fred Steekel brought ejectment against Reuben G. Vancil. The plaintiff claimed the land as an accretion to lots owned by him bordering on the Arkansas river, and also by virtue of a long-continued possession. The defendant claimed as a purchaser from the state under the statute authorizing islands in navigable rivers to be disposed of as school land. The issues of fact were determined by a jury in favor of the defendant. Judgment was rendered on the verdict, and the plaintiff appeals.

The statute referred to reads:

“All islands lying in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scott v. LattigSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Whitaker v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. State ex rel. Dawson v. AkersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hecker v. BleishSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. State ex rel. Wertz v. BerkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Shore v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Shore v. Shell Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API