Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dawson v. Akers

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1914No. 18,985PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This is an original action in mandamus, ‘the purpose of which is to test the constitutionality of ■chapter 259 of the Session Laws of 1913.

The statute attempts to regulate the sale and taking • of sand and other natural products from navigable .rivers and streams which are the property of the state, ■and to provide for payment to the state of royalties for sand and other products taken from the rivers for •commercial purposes.

The defendants other than the state treasurer and the state auditor are persons and firms engaged in the business of…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
  3. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  5. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Rice v. StewartMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Kittredge v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. United States v. Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Putnam v. PutnamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API