Shore v. Shell Petroleum Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
The issue in these eases is, Who owns certain portions of the Arkansas River bed in Sumner County, Kansas, — the State of Kansas or appellants who claim as riparian proprietors. The bills allege that the river has always been non-navigable in its course through Sumner County, that the state’s executive council composed of state officers, including the Governor as a member, had given oil and gas leases on the river bed to some of the a.ppellees who had put down wells on the portions of the bed claimed by appel*2lants, were producing oil therefrom, paying royalties on the oil…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oneida Indian Nation Of New York v. City Of SherrillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. City of SherrillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003