Legal Opinion

Shore v. Shell Petroleum Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 7, 1932No. Nos. 622-625PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

The issue in these eases is, Who owns certain portions of the Arkansas River bed in Sumner County, Kansas, — the State of Kansas or appellants who claim as riparian proprietors. The bills allege that the river has always been non-navigable in its course through Sumner County, that the state’s executive council composed of state officers, including the Governor as a member, had given oil and gas leases on the river bed to some of the a.ppellees who had put down wells on the portions of the bed claimed by appel*2lants, were producing oil therefrom, paying royalties on the oil…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oneida Indian Nation Of New York v. City Of SherrillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. City of SherrillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API