Legal Opinion
Beaupied v. Doe (In Re Doe)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Decided March 5, 1996No. 17-40816PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
DENNIS MONTALI, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction *
The debtor in this Chapter 13 case (“Debt- or”) has proposed a Chapter 13 plan whereby she will pay secured creditors in full, with no dividend to be paid to unsecured creditors. The plan attempts to deny priority (and thus leave completely unpaid) attorney’s fees and expenses that are part of a state court judgment in an action for the custody of Debtor’s minor daughter (“Child”). The attorney’s fees are owed to Aleta Beaupied, Esq. (“Beaupied”) and the expenses are claimed by Child’s father (“Father”).
Beaupied, the court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- In Re Theodore W. Spong, Debtor. Raymond J. Pauley v. Theodore W. SpongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Wetmore v. MarkoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Beaupied v. Chang (In re Chang)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re NewmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Madden v. Staggs (In Re Staggs)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1996
- Polishuk v. Polishuk (In Re Polishuk)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1999
- In Re BeverlyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.