Deal v. Migoski
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PEARSON, Judge.
The appellant, John J. Deal, owned a distributive interest in the estate of his grandmother. The appellee was Deal’s attorney who was hired to effect a prompt settlement of the estate. For his fee the attorney was to receive one-third of Deal’s ultimate distribution. The attorney, however, purchased the client’s entire interest in the estate. Thereafter Deal brought a complaint in chancery seeking rescission and alleged that the purchase was unconscionable. This appeal is from a final decree for the defendant. The decree is reversed and the cause remanded for further…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Bolles v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Gerlach v. DonnellySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- State v. SnyderSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Renno v. SigmonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fernandez v. CunninghamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Nelson v. WaldenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Crigler v. State, Department of TransportationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Kittel v. SimmoniteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- McCreary v. JoelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.