Legal Opinion

Deal v. Migoski

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 14, 1960No. 59-143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellant, John J. Deal, owned a distributive interest in the estate of his grandmother. The appellee was Deal’s attorney who was hired to effect a prompt settlement of the estate. For his fee the attorney was to receive one-third of Deal’s ultimate distribution. The attorney, however, purchased the client’s entire interest in the estate. Thereafter Deal brought a complaint in chancery seeking rescission and alleged that the purchase was unconscionable. This appeal is from a final decree for the defendant. The decree is reversed and the cause remanded for further…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  2. Bolles v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  3. Gerlach v. DonnellySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Renno v. SigmonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. CunninghamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Nelson v. WaldenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Crigler v. State, Department of TransportationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Kittel v. SimmoniteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. McCreary v. JoelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API