Legal Opinion

McCreary v. Joel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 13, 1965No. Nos. F-463, F-510PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLS, Judge.

Appellant-Plaintiff Alsina Zapf Thornton McCreary instituted these actions, which were consolidated by order of this court, seeking damages upon the claim that she had been defrauded by her attorneys, defendants-appellees Louis Joel and Norman P. Freedman. In his final decree, the chancellor summarizes the issues between the parties and the facts as follows:

“This cause came on to be heard on the merits. The Plaintiff herein claims that she was defrauded by her attorneys, the Defendants, when the Defendants acquired her interest in litigation they were handling for her in the year…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deal v. MigoskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. State ex rel. Florida Bar v. SteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCreary v. JoelSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. McCreary v. FreedmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API