Legal Opinion

Bolles v. O'Brien

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1912PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Duval County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.

— A suit in equity was brought by Bolles to cancel an instrument of writing relating to lands, or to dissolve the co-partnership, if any exists, under the instrument, upon the theory that because of the relation of attorney and client existing between O’Brien and Bolles with reference to the lands, the circumstances under which the instrument was prepared by O’Brien, the attorney, and signed by Bolles, and the lack of consideration on the part of O’Brien for the interest he claims, the agreement is an imposition upon Bolles and any recognition or enforcement of it inequitable to Bolles. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. YaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1852
  2. Kidd v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  3. Lane v. BlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Crocheron v. SavageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  5. Graves v. J. M. Harris & BrotherSupreme Court of Florida · 1912

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Farrington v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Williams v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  3. Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers Assn.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Gerlach v. DonnellySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Sampliner v. Motion Picture Patents Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API