Legal Opinion
Hopkins v. Kelsey-Hayes, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 18, 1978No. Civ. A. 78-1646PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Defendant in this diversity case moves for summary judgment, Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, on the ground that plaintiff’s action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Because we find that the running of the statute has been tolled by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-22, we deny the motion.
Plaintiff is a New Jersey resident. Defendant is a foreign corporation, organized under the Delaware corporation laws. Defendant admits at ¶ 1 of its answer to the complaint and in its supplemental brief that it has not filed a certificate to do business or a certificate of authority in New…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lemke v. BaileySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Whalen v. YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Gotheiner v. LenihanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Lanahan v. NeviusDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Whalen v. YoungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coons v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Velmohos v. Maren Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Hopkins v. Kelsey-Hayes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Industrial Consultants, Inc. v. H. S. Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.