Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Black

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided April 17, 1986No. 11-85-119-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DICKENSON, Justice.

The issue is whether there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that defendant “was negligent in failing to have properly designed” the washing machine which it sold to plaintiffs and that such negligence was a proximate cause of the fire which burned plaintiffs’ mobile home. The jury also answered in another portion of the charge that the washing machine was not defectively designed at the time it was manufactured, but there is no point of error urging a conflict in these answers.1

*926Mr. and Mrs. Black bought a Sears Kenmore washer on November 6, 1979.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Martinez v. Delta Brands, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State Board of Insurance v. Westland Film IndustriesTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gulf Consolidated International, Inc. v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seasword v. Hilti, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. SSP Partners v. Gladstrong Investments (USA) Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  3. Jackson v. Coldspring Terrace Property Owners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  4. Long v. United States Brass Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2004
  5. Reiss v. Komatsu America Corp.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API