Legal Opinion

Long v. United States Brass Corp.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided August 17, 2004No. CIV. 03-B-968 (BNB), 04-B-613 (BNB)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, Chief Judge.

The Plaintiff in this product liability action, Claire Long (“Long”), moves for summary judgment on the issue who should bear responsibility if she is able to' prove that her injuries resulted from a defect in a propane gas pipe. She argues that the Defendant, United States Brass Corporation (“US Brass”), is the apparent manufacturer because U.S. Brass packaged and sold the product as its own and did not disclose at the time of sale that the part was actually manufactured by the Defendant, Dormont Manufacturing Company (“Dormont”).

On Friday,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Jerome Otteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Carmela Mares v. Conagra Poultry Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Burkert v. Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rublee v. Carrier Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Heinrich v. Master Craft Engineering, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2015
  3. Reiss v. Komatsu America Corp.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2010
  4. Margaret Rublee, Et Ano. v. Carrier Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. McQuivey v. Fulmer Helmets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API