Cogdell v. 1999 O'Ravez Family, LLC
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Today we hold the trial court abused its discretion by failing to do substantial justice when ordering an easement as an equitable remedy after finding respondents Ronald J. Cogdell and Catherine L. Cogdell encroached on land owned by appellant, the 1999 O’Ravez Family LLC. The easement permits the Cogdells’ considerable encroachments to remain on the O’Ravez property without offsetting relief for O’Ravez. The Cogdells argue the trial court correctly decided their earlier bankruptcy *387discharge prevents compensation, but considering the bankruptcy court lifted its automatic stay to allow a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cogdell v. 1999 O'RAVEZ FAMILY, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Levack Family Trust Ellen Levack v. John & Marilyin Leach, Et UxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State of Washington v. Tim McManisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025