Legal Opinion

Keenan v. International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 13, 2009No. 1:08-cr-00147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 44). As explained herein, the Court GRANTS the motion IN PART as to Plaintiffs’ fed eral claims, and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs’ state-law claims. In accordance with District of Maine Local Rule 7(f), the Court determines that this matter can be decided without oral argument, and thus DENIES the parties’ Motions for Oral Argument (Docket # s 80 & 81).

I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

Summary judgment is appropriate only if the record shows “that…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. UnióN De Empleados De Muelles De P.R., Inc. v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. Keenan v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2013
  3. Boardman v. Service Employees International UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  4. Keenan v. International Assoc. of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
  5. NORTON v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE-ORONO PHYSICS DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API