Legal Opinion

United States v. Felix William Maranzino, D/B/A P & B Sales

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 1, 1988No. 87-2561, 87-2885PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties to these appeals have waived oral argument. The causes are therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Defendant appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss an indictment against him. The indictment, filed in 1987, charged defendant with two counts of making false statements to a federally insured financial institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014. Defendant based his motion to dismiss primarily on double jeopardy grounds, arguing that a 1985 indictment against him included a similar count under § 1014 and that the similar count was dismissed by the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States Department of Justice v. JulianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Juan A. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Garcia-RosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Robert Larry Mayes, and Dallas Earl ScottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. ApodacaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. AilsworthDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API