Legal Opinion

United States v. Lewis

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 12, 2010No. 08-1170, 08-1171PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Norman Schmidt and Charles Lewis conducted a Ponzi scheme through a num ber of ostensible investment companies (the “scheme companies”). Prospective investors were told that they would be participating in an exclusive program that purchased high-yield notes whose principal was guaranteed by reputable insurers. But their money was never used to purchase such notes. Rather, funds from new clients were used to pay the operators of the scheme and to pay off earlier investors. The scheme, which lasted from April 1999 until late 2004, resulted in estimated losses…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Yeley-DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. DamatoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Jeremiah Felton v. Byran BartowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Christian AllmendingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API