Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Larry Mayes, and Dallas Earl Scott

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 24, 1990No. 90-3016, 90-3017PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Robert Mayes and Dallas Scott were each convicted, in a joint trial, of one count of conspiring to distribute heroin in the Leavenworth federal prison and fifteen counts of using a telephone in the commission of the crime.

I

The defendants claim that the indictment should have been dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 48(b) because of the delay between the offense and the indictment, and that the period between indictment and trial exceeded that permitted by the Speedy Trial Act. 1

Rule 48(b) provides that “[i]f there is unnecessary delay in presenting the…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Maggio v. FulfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. LobatoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. United States v. John Javilo McCullahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Ira Silverman (90-3205) Morris G. Woodard (90-5816) and Gary Caton (90-5733/91-6506)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Soto-BeniquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Norman D. Wright, United States of America v. George W. Kirby, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API