Legal Opinion

Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center Associates

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 1986No. C7-86-39PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant challenges a judgment dismissing its complaint, claiming the trial court erroneously determined appellant’s contractual rights under a settlement agreement. We reverse.

FACTS

On July 21, 1981, respondent Blooming-ton Commerce and Trade Center Associates, a partnership consisting of William O. Cooley and Arthur J. Petrie (Cooley-Petrie), executed a purchase agreement with seller Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission (Commission). Closing was scheduled for November 1, 1982 with a purchase price of $14,249,075. The involved property consisted of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Marriage of Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Knecht Bros. v. Ames Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Hoyt Inv. v. BLOOMINGTON COM. & TR. CTR.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API