Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center Associates
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellant challenges a judgment dismissing its complaint, claiming the trial court erroneously determined appellant’s contractual rights under a settlement agreement. We reverse.
FACTS
On July 21, 1981, respondent Blooming-ton Commerce and Trade Center Associates, a partnership consisting of William O. Cooley and Arthur J. Petrie (Cooley-Petrie), executed a purchase agreement with seller Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission (Commission). Closing was scheduled for November 1, 1982 with a purchase price of $14,249,075. The involved property consisted of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Knecht Bros. v. Ames Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Hoyt Inv. v. BLOOMINGTON COM. & TR. CTR.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988