Legal Opinion

Hoyt Inv. v. BLOOMINGTON COM. & TR. CTR.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 22, 1988No. C5-86-2131Published

1Opinion of the Court

418 N.W.2d 173 (1988)

HOYT INVESTMENT COMPANY, et al., Respondents,

v.

BLOOMINGTON COMMERCE AND TRADE CENTER ASSOCIATES, et al., Petitioners, Appellants,

The Port Authority of the City of Bloomington, The City of Bloomington, and The Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission, Defendants.

No. C5-86-2131.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 22, 1988.

Robert J. Sheran, Theresa B. Bonner, Luke H. Terhaar, Minneapolis, for Bloomington Commerce and Trade Center.

James R. Bresnahan, William D. Paul, St. Paul, for Hoyt Inv.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

COYNE, Justice.

On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Arndt v. American Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Ford v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API