Legal Opinion

Ford v. Ball

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Doddridge County. Action by W. Ford against Z. T. Ball. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Poffenrarger, Judge:

The .judgment for $120.00 recovered in the circuit court of Doddridge County, on an appeal from the judgment of a, justice, and complained of here, is the amount of the bonus-, paid for a lease of certain lands for oil and gas purposes.

The legal title to the premises in question was held by Z.. T. Ball, the defendant, as guardian for two infants, Cleveland' Ball and John Ball, the former of whom, having attained his-, majority, before the date of the lease, though not designated as lessor in the caption thereof, affixed his signature and seal to it and received one-half of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stott v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Harrison v. SimonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. The Agricultural Bank of Mississippi and Others, in Error v. Charles Rice and Mary His Wife, and Martha PhippsSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  4. Harms v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Laughlin Bros. v. FreamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dishman v. JarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Schull Const. Co. v. Webster Ind. School Dist. No. 101South Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hope Natural Gas Co. v. JarvisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Schull Const. Co. v. Webster Ind. School Dist. No. 101South Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  5. The Hope St. Garage Co. v. Pacific Oil Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API