Legal Opinion

Stott v. Rutherford

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 24, 1876No. 123PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swayne

This is an action of covenant brought upon an indenture of lease executed by the plaintiffs in error, and one P. D. Gurley, since deceased, to the defendant in error. The declaration sets out sundry breaches of stipulations contained in the lease. The defendant pleaded non est factum, and satisfaction of the claim of the plaintiffs by payment. Upon the trial, several bills of exception were taken by the defendant. They show that he made numerous points, all of which were overruled by the court. Only one of them requires consideration. He objected to the admission of the lease in evidence,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grannis v. ClarkCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
  2. Barney v. KeithNew York Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gasner v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. New Domain Oil & Gas Co. v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Headley v. HoopengarnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Conrad v. . MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Pennsylvania R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1903

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API