Legal Opinion
Toshiba Corp. v. Imation Corp.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 31, 2013No. 09-cv-305-slcPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STEPHEN L. CROCKER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Following a six-day trial in this patent infringement lawsuit over optical disc technology, the jury found that defendants Imation Corp., Moser Baer India, Ltd., Ritek Corp. and CMC Magnetics Corp. (but not defendants Advanced Media Inc. and Hotan Corp.) induced infringement of Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,831,966 (the '966 patent) and Claims 1, 2 and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 5,892,751 (the '751 patent). The jury found in favor of all defendants on plaintiff Toshiba Corporation’s claim that they directly infringed Claim 1 of the *887'…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Lori David v. Caterpillar, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ultratec, Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2022