Legal Opinion

Mills v. Lloyds

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 3, 1991No. A91A0817PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cooper, Judge.

Appellant, Izeal Mills, (hereafter “Mills”) applied for a homeowner’s insurance policy through The Sorrells Agency, an independent insurance agency. Because Mills cannot read or write, a secretary at The Sorrells Agency assisted him with the application by asking him the questions on the application and writing down responses. The Sorrells Agency sent the completed application to the managing general agent for appellee who issued a Lloyd’s, London homeowner’s policy on a house owned by Mills and his wife. The application indicated that the house was not vacant and was owner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stillson v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Liberty National Life Insurance v. HoukSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. O'Kelly v. Southland Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Browning v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Davis v. BrowningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jennings v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Network America Life Insurance v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API