Legal Opinion
Sinco, Inc. v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 1, 2001No. 99 CIV 10631 (AKH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HELLERSTEIN, District Judge.
In this action for breach of contract, the parties filed cross-motions for summary-judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Oral argument was heard on December 14, 2000. For the reasons stated below, I grant the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company (“Metro-North”) and deny the motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Sinco, Inc. (“Sinco”). I refer the case to Magistrate Judge…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Septembertide Publishing, B.V. v. Stein And Day, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- AMA Systems, LLC v. 3B Tech, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- TA Operating LLC v. Comdata, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2017