Legal Opinion

Security & Investment Co. v. Oregon City

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1939PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a suit to quiet title to the so-called street ends or extensions of 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, and 10th streets in Oregon City from Water street westerly to the Willamette river as shown on the ‘ ‘map and plan” of Oregon City, acknowledged by Dr. John McLoughlin on December 2, 1850, and filed on January 7, 1851. Plaintiff asserts that, by virtue of mesne conveyances from the heirs, legatees, and devisees of Dr. McLoughlin and by certain sheriffs’ tax deeds, it is the owner in fee simple of the above strips of land.

The defendant city does not deny that title is vested in the plaintiff if…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harris v. HelensOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hogue v. City of AlbinaOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Oregon City v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. City of Clatskanie v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Lownsdale v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Thornton v. HayOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Dept. of Trans. v. LundbergOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Darling v. ChristensenOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Evergreen Waste Systems, Inc. v. Metropolitan Service DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1986
  5. Muzzy v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API