Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 2008No. A07-1439PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Justice.

Appellant Chad Jeffrey Thompson challenges a Douglas County District Court order, which imposed, among other things, concurrent 10-year conditional release periods for his second and third criminal sexual conduct convictions. Thompson argues that the court erred in its interpretation of Minn.Stat. § 609.109, subd. 5 (1998). The court óf appeals reduced the 10-year conditional release period for the second offense to 5 years but affirmed the remaining 10-year conditional release period for the third offense. We reverse.

The material facts are undisputed. Between March…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State v. EngleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. HoelzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Martinez-MendozaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Molde v. CitiMortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. State of Minnesota v. Carl Lee NodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Hennepin County v. HillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API