State v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
Appellant Chad Jeffrey Thompson challenges a Douglas County District Court order, which imposed, among other things, concurrent 10-year conditional release periods for his second and third criminal sexual conduct convictions. Thompson argues that the court erred in its interpretation of Minn.Stat. § 609.109, subd. 5 (1998). The court óf appeals reduced the 10-year conditional release period for the second offense to 5 years but affirmed the remaining 10-year conditional release period for the third offense. We reverse.
The material facts are undisputed. Between March…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. EngleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. HoelzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. Martinez-MendozaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Molde v. CitiMortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State of Minnesota v. Carl Lee NodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Hennepin County v. HillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.