Miller v. Eldridge
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KELLER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Kentucky’s appellate courts review trial court rulings regarding the admissibility of expert witness testimony under an abuse of discretion standard. The Court of Appeals in this case held that the admission of the testimony of Bruce Taylor (“Taylor”) had been an abuse of discretion because his testimony failed to meet the relevance and reliability requirements of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1 We must determine whether the Court of Appeals properly applied the abuse of discretion standard of review. We hold that it did not because it improperly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- David Oddi v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Gray v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- CertainTeed Corp. v. DexterKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- McClure v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015
- Ragland v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Luna v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.