Ragland v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice COOPER.
Appellant, Shane Layton Ragland, was convicted by a Fayette Circuit Court jury of murder and sentenced to thirty years in prison. He appeals to this Court as a matter of right, Ky. Const. § 110(2)(b), asserting eight claims of reversible error, viz: (1) failure to grant Appellant’s motion for a *573change of venue; (2) admission of expert testimony with respect to the results of comparative bullet lead analysis (CBLA) tests; (3) failure to grant a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence that the CBLA expert had knowingly given false testimony at…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Brown v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. Cuong Phu LeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Meece v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- United States v. HiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.