Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1965PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The plaintiff obtained a verdict for damages for personal injuries against the defendants Johnson and Wallace. These defendants contend that they and the plaintiff’s employer are employers subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Act and, therefore, are immunized against plaintiff’s claim. Defendants appeal from the trial court’s findings and conclusions that such defendants are not immune. The trial court dismissed the action against the defendant Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co.

Kiewit had a contract with the -state to construct a portion of Interstate Highway No. 5 in southern Oregon. Plaintiff was a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kowcun v. BybeeOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Rasmussen v. George Benz & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Johnson v. Timber Structures, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Plummer v. Donald M. Drake Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Pruett v. LININGEROregon Supreme Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cornelison v. SeaboldOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Carter v. Sims Crane Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Fields v. Jantec, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Duk Hwan Chung v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hanson v. Versarail Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API