Legal Opinion
Duk Hwan Chung v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 26, 1976No. Trial Court 410-582, Case 24443PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBohannon, J.
(Pro Tempore).
This is an action for damages for personal injuries brought by an employe against his employer on account of an accidental injury the employe sustained in the course and arising out of his employment. The defendant-employer, Fred Meyer, Inc., was a complying employer under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, ORS 656.001 et seq, and was providing workmen’s compensation coverage to its employes including plaintiff at the time of plaintiff’s injury.
As provided by ORS 656.384 the Attorney General appeared on behalf of the defendant-employer and filed an answer invoking the defense that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jenkins v. Carman Mfc. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Bigby v. Pelican Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Heikkila v. Ewen Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Caline v. MaedeOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Shoemaker v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Reed Tool Co. v. CopelinTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Kittell v. Vermont Weatherboard, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Robert John Gulden v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, Gregory Steele v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation, a Nevada CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Palmer v. Bi-Mart CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.