Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1984No. 098-83PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

The ijuestion upon which we granted discretionary review is: When an issue of incompetency to stand trial is raised during trial, by what standard is the trial court to determine whether there is evidence to support a finding of incompetency to stand trial? Stated in other terms, was Johnson v. State, 564 S.W.2d 707 (Tex.Cr.App.1977) correctly decided, given the subsequent opinion of the Court in Sisco v. State, 599 S.W.2d 607 (Tex.Cr.App.1980).

On original submission the Amarillo Court of Appeals followed Sisco v. State,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sisco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1982
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Turner, Albert JamesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Alcott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Lahood, Ex Parte Michael GeorgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API