Legal Opinion

Shelby Mills, Inc. v. Nami

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1924No. 8706PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.

This is a damage suit for refusing to accept and pay for merchandise sold and delivered.

The petition alleged that the plaintiffs, residents of Memphis, Tennessee, sold to defendant, for the price of $1,812.60, merchandise described in the invoices annexed to their petition; that the defendant refused to accept and pay for- said merchandise and returned them to plaintiff; that the plaintiff thereupon sold said merchandise for the price of $1,117.77, thus suffering a loss of $694.83, for which it claims judgment.

The answer admits the purchase, but avers that under the order given by defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Murray v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  4. Jennings-Heywood Oil Syndicate v. Houssiere-Latreille Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  5. Sitman v. LindseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haskins Trading Co. v. S. Pfeifer & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Kinsell & Locke, Inc. v. KohlmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API